Pluralism in private spaces: homeowners associations, clubs, shopping malls
The question of “pluralism” is different in public spaces and in private spaces.
The question of “pluralism” is different in public spaces and in private spaces.
Chiodelli F. (2015), “Religion and the city: A review on Muslim spatiality in Italian cities”, Cities, 44: 19-28
Chiodelli F., Moroni S. (2015), “Do Malls Contribute to the Privatisation of Public Space and the Erosion of the Public Sphere? Reconsidering the Role of Shopping Centres”, City, Culture and Society 6(1): 35-42
Chiodelli F., De Carli B., Falletti M., Scavuzzo L., Eds. (2014) Cities to Be Tamed? Spatial Investigations Across the Urban South, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Moroni S., Chiodelli F. (2014) “Municipal regulations and the use of public space: local ordinances in Italy”, City, Territory and Architecture, 1:11
Chiodelli F., Baglione V. (2013), “Living Together Privately: for a Cautious Reading of Cohousing”, Urban Research and Practice, 7 (1): 20-34
Chiodelli F., Moroni S. (2013), “Typology of Spaces and Topology of Toleration: City, Pluralism and Ownership”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 36 (2): 167-181.
Private spaces have also crucially contributed to defining and determining what a city is
The necessity of public space is above all dependent upon its ‘functional’ value, whereas its ‘symbolic’ value is merely secondary
The paper analyses the territorial implications of the Israeli barrier/wall with reference to the metropolitan area of Jerusalem